fbpx

Normally Biblical Archaeology Review posts only the introductions to their articles online (unless you’re a premier member), but the March/April issue is now available to all in its entirety.  There are a number of interesting articles, but instead of listing them here, you can click over yourself

I offer only a comment on one article here: I think that Shanks’ article on Emmaus is well-written, but he comes to the wrong conclusion.  I think that he wanted to write an article on the site at Latrun (formerly known as Emmaus and Nicopolis) and this pushed him to adopt this as the location of Emmaus of Luke 24.  While he recognizes the problems with this site (namely the inferior textual evidence and the lengthy distance to walk in a day), he dismisses them too quickly.  He never discusses any of the evidence for Motza/Moza/Colonieh.  Nor does anyone dispute that the Latrun site was known as Emmaus in the 1st century.  The issue is was this the Emmaus that Luke referred to, and I think the evidence makes this an unlikely candidate.

Another view is that of J. Carl Laney, given in a chapter of his doctoral dissertation.  With his permission I have digitized this chapter and posted it online (pdf).  Though the discussion is briefer, I prefer Notley’s conclusion on page 368 of The Sacred Bridge.  For now, I have to leave it at that.  I think all would agree that the issue is difficult.  I appreciate BAS making this issue available for all to read and discuss.

Moza from southwest, tb030803325
Moza, identified as “Emmaus” by Josephus; 30 stadia distant from Jerusalem
Share:

One of the best Bible software programs for the PC is BibleWorks 7.  If you’re only interested in reading the Bible and doing simple searches, this program is more than you need.  But those who know, or plan to learn, the original languages will find a wealth of capabilities available at lightning speed.  The powerful “Copy Center” makes it fast and easy to copy and paste multiple translations – any number, any versions – in a single click.  This would have saved me a lot of time on a recent study.  The right-click context menus are also easy to use.  If you’re still learning Greek and Hebrew (or haven’t started yet), the built-in flashcard module has plenty of options which makes it easy to quiz yourself.  At $350, the program is not inexpensive, but browsing through the list of works included in the copyright list will make you wonder how the software can cost so little.

Version 7 added a map module, and BibleWorks sent me a review copy of the program to evaluate this new feature.  I love the integration of the map module; simply right-click on a site name and choose “Lookup in BibleWorks Maps” to get a list of relevant maps to open.  Teachers will find this a handy way to access a map while in the middle of a course without having to use other software.  The module includes a variety of terrains that you can load, including Landsat data, and some are more aesthetically pleasing than others.  Unfortunately, the map data has significant shortcomings; it reminds me more of a beta program.  BibleWorks has a major revision of the map module underway which I expect will solve many of the labeling problems.  One problem that exists with both the map module and the program in general is that while the documentation is extensive, the features are not always intuitive.  This means the happiest user will be the one who reads first and plays second.  If you never read any of the documentation, you’ll probably miss many of the features and spend too much time in frustration.  Would I recommend the program?  Absolutely.  Would I recommend its purchase primarily for the map module?  Not yet.  With their policy of free upgrades within a version, any existing user will be able to download all of the updates as they are released.

bibleworks_maps
Screenshot of Galilee area, with overlays turned on for 4 gospels
Share: