Norman Golb’s Son Arrested on Charges of Impersonation

Having been the victim of unwelcome, sometimes lengthy, and usually inflammatory comments on posts on this blog related to the Dead Sea Scrolls, I’m happy to see that New York police have arrested a man for allegedly creating many false identities, impersonating scholars, and slandering Dr. Lawrence Schiffman.  The guilty party, whether he is the accused or someone else, had a single agenda: to promote the widely panned theories of Dr. Norman Golb.  I have long been curious what sort of person would be so committed to such an endeavor as to spend countless hours to promote this view in places that have little real significance (this and other blogs, Wikipedia).  The answer, if NY prosecutors are correct, makes some sense: the perpetrator was Golb’s son.  That son, however, was not 14 years old, but 49.  One scholar who has wrangled extensively with the multiple-aliased offender is Bob Cargill.  A scholar at UCLA, Cargill has posted an extraordinary catalog of the campaign of this individual (be he the accused or someone else).  A few hours after Cargill posted his catalog, NY police announced the arrest.  From the NY Times:

For decades, the origin of the Dead Sea Scrolls has been intensely debated.
The prevailing theory is that these ancient documents, which include texts from the Hebrew Bible, were written over the three centuries before 100 A.D. by a Jewish sect known as the Essenes, who were based in Qumran, a settlement at the northwest shore of the Dead Sea near the caves where the scrolls were found between 1947 and 1956.
An alternative theory, passionately proffered by a University of Chicago professor, is that the scrolls’ authors were not Essenes, and that the scrolls themselves were kept in various libraries in Jerusalem until they were hidden in the caves around Qumran for safekeeping during the Roman war of A.D. 67 to 73. Qumran, he has said, was not an Essene monastery but a fortress, one of several armed defensive bastions around Jerusalem.
The professor, Norman Golb, has stood behind his theory despite significant criticism. His son, Raphael Haim Golb, has been one of his greatest allies.
But prosecutors said on Thursday that Raphael Golb took defending his father’s theory too far. Mr. Golb is accused of using stolen identities of various people, including a New York University professor who disagreed with his father, to elevate his father’s theory and besmirch its critics, Robert M. Morgenthau, the Manhattan district attorney, said at a news conference.
Mr. Golb, 49, was arrested Thursday morning and charged in Manhattan Criminal Court with identity theft, criminal impersonation and aggravated harassment. He faces up to four years in prison if convicted.
Prosecutors said Mr. Golb opened an e-mail account in the name of Lawrence H. Schiffman, the New York University professor who disagreed with Mr. Golb’s father. He sent messages in Professor Schiffman’s name to various people at N.Y.U. and to others involved in the Dead Sea Scrolls debate, fabricating an admission by Professor Schiffman that he had plagiarized some of Professor Golb’s work, Mr. Morgenthau said. Raphael Golb also set up blogs under various names that accused Dr. Schiffman of plagiarism, Mr. Morgenthau said.

NYUNews has posted one of the emails that Golb is alleged to have forged.

(HT: Joe Lauer)

Unfortunately dad’s response is not altogether encouraging.

Reached at his office in Chicago on Thursday afternoon, Professor Golb said he was shocked at the allegations leveled against his son, who is a real estate lawyer and has a Ph.D in comparative literature from Harvard.
“My son is an honorable person,” Professor Golb said. “He could not have done such a thing.”
Professor Golb said that opposing scholars had tried to quash his views over the years through tactics like barring him from Dead Sea Scrolls exhibitions. He said he saw the criminal charges as another attack on his work.
“Don’t you see how there was kind of a setup?” he said. “This was to hit me harder.”

I’m not sure that this is the best time for Professor Golb to be complaining of the same thing that led the impersonator to carry out his campaign.


7 thoughts on “Norman Golb’s Son Arrested on Charges of Impersonation

  1. “Don’t you see how there was kind of a setup?”
    Right, proponents of the Essene theory enlisted the help and cooperation of New York’s finest in a conspiracy to discredit him by arresting his son for identity theft and harassment. Uh huh.
    And the Ark of the Covenant is hidden in the back room of some NYPD station too.

  2. In this country indictment does not equal conviction.

    So while the case is worth a mention, as long as nothing is known beyond the original charge, one must wait further develoments.

    It is really not worth the rehashing and endless repetition
    found on some lists.

  3. The majority opinion also needs to be clarified. It’s not that all the scrolls were written there at Qumran by Essenes, but that some were, and others were brought from elsewhere over an extended period of time by Essenes coming to Qumran. Most of the articles approach it in a zero-sum manner, “zero” being Golb’s (wrong) position that no scrolls were written at Qumran, and they all originated elsewhere, with their being collected into those caves (some not very hidden!) in the Great Revolt crisis. The “sum” would be the (false) conception that all the scrolls were written at Qumran, which seems only to result from a misreading of various writers.

    That said, I’m not even a DSS scholar and I’ve received several messages that were among Golb’s panoply of aliases, including one which (very mistakenly on his part) impersonated one of my former instructors. All were as expected. It’ll be interesting to see how all this turns out.

  4. OK, I’m thinking the second post is suspect. Did they get his computer and his he out on bail?-G-

    I remember some of those posts. It struck me as kind of creepy that this poster seemed to appear out of nowhere and post with such latent anger. This all seems to fit.

  5. Raphael Golb's account of his trial:


    In response to Kevin Edgecomb's interesting comment:

    Norman Golb, in his response to Professor Schiffman's "confidential" letter to NYU officials, does not seem to take a "zero-sum" approach. See the paragraph at the bottom of p. 10:

    "S. does not define what he means by a scroll “dissident.” By the standards of Qumranological belief set by Père de Vaux and his original team in the 1950s, most scholars of the subject today are dissidents, with many nuanced theories crowding the Internet. What S. apparently means by his statement is that any scholar who professes belief that there was, for at least some period of time, no matter how long or short, an actual religious sect either inhabiting Kh. Qumran or that was living somewhere in its vicinity, and whose identification one may either know or not know, and whose members either fled from Jerusalem or did not, is entitled to be anointed a non-dissident and to attend meetings where he and his colleagues lecture to one another. The position of S. and his fellow believers is thus that those scholars who do not accept these ideas of the traditional Qumranologists may or may not be allowed to lecture at meetings on the Scrolls, depending on the good grace of the traditionalists."

    What say ye, Kevin?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *