Every now and again a sensational story related to biblical archaeology hits the headlines. (This week it was this one.) It’s not long before I receive emails asking about the authenticity of the alleged discovery. To help my readers better discern whether they are dealing with a potentially legitimate discovery or not, I suggest that the following questions be asked as you read the report.

• Does this discovery sound too good to be true? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• It is reported by a news source you’ve never heard of? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does it cite archaeologists that you’ve never heard of before and don’t appear on a Google search? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does the report avoid getting input from known experts in the field? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does the alleged discovery require a radical reinterpretation of the Bible? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does the article use language such as, “This definitively proves…” or, “This is irrefutable evidence that shows…”? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does it relate to newly discovered physical remains related to the crucifixion of Jesus? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does the article mention Ron Wyatt, Robert Cornuke, or Indiana Jones? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Is it first announced in a TV special about the time of Easter/Passover? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does the discovery relate to Noah’s Ark or the Ark of the Covenant? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Is it reported on a website with links to stories about Bigfoot, UFOs, and conspiracy theories? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Does the website name begin with www.world….? If so, it’s probably bogus.
• Did I ignore it on this blog? If so, it’s probably bogus.

Did I miss some important questions? Feel free to suggest additional ones in the comments below.