A friend tipped me off that my summer travels this year would have me near Chautauqua Institution in western New York, the location of Palestine Park.  Originally built in 1874, the model of the land of Palestine (as it was then known) has been reconstructed and enlarged over the years to its present size of 350 feet long (110 m) at a scale of 1.75 feet to the mile (0.34 meters to the km).

The model blends into its surroundings and you don’t realize you’ve arrived until you’re standing in it.  This is a view of the area from the “north” with the edge of “Mount Hermon” visible on the right.

100802340tb Approaching Palestine Park

The best view of the model is from the top of Mount Hermon.  Lake Chautauqua stands in for the Mediterranean Sea, but since the park is on the lake’s western shore, the sun rises on the wrong side of this “world.”

100802338tb Palestine Park overview from north

The model includes major landmarks such as Mount Tabor, the Hill of Moreh, and the Jezreel Valley, but I found it difficult to easily identify the physical features because of the uniform shade of the green grass.

100802308tb Palestine Park view north

In the photo below, you can see the Sea of Galilee distinctly, and in the foreground the labeled sites are Nain (left) and Mt. Moreh (center).

100802302tb Palestine Park northern hills

The two major lakes are the most easily identifiable features and both are shaped appropriately.  The Sea of Galilee (below) is surrounded by biblical cities (not exactly in the right places), including Tiberias, Magdala, Capernaum, Bethsaida, and Gergesa.  Perceptive visitors may wonder why the “Mount of Beatitudes” is placed on a high mountain on the lake’s west side.  This reflects a 19th-century view that Jesus gave the Sermon on the Mount at the place today known as Mt. Arbel.

100802303tb Palestine Park Sea of Galilee

Every Sunday and Monday evenings a local pastor, allegedly in costume, gives presentations of the model using biblical stories.  Mounts Gerizim and Ebal, located under the boys, would provide an ideal place for many wonderful and important history lessons.

100802307tb Palestine Park Mt Gerizim and Mt Ebal

Jerusalem is uniquely marked on the model with a depiction of the (modern) Old City walls.  The model labels a mixture of sites from the Old Testament, New Testament, and later periods. 

Approximately sixty sites are identified, including the Mount of Olives and Bethany (behind Jerusalem in the photo below).

100802310tb Palestine Park, Jerusalem, Mount of Olives

The model also includes the rugged hill country of Transjordan and labels sites including Macherus, Mt. Nebo, Ramoth-gilead, and Gerasa.  The large lake shown below is the Dead Sea.  For a better photo that includes the lisan peninsula, see yesterday’s post.

100802323tb Palestine Park, Dead Sea, Transjordan

For more information about the premises where the model is located, you can visit the website of the Chautauqua Institution (but Palestine Park is ignored on the site).  The entrance fee for the morning was $16, which I felt was a bit unfair, especially since I only spent about 15 minutes at the model (but more than that walking in from the parking lot).  Wikipedia has a brief article about the place, and you can quickly locate the site on Google Maps here.  If you visit in the summer on a Sunday or Monday evening, you can join the free tour (weather permitting).  At other times , you can enjoy a self-guided tour with the assistance of either a cassette tape or a booklet.

A connection I only learned when writing this post is that the man who directed the creation of the park, John H. Vincent, co-wrote Earthly Footsteps of the Man of Galilee, one of the first works that I selected for the Historic Views of the Holy Land series.  He is listed on the title page as the “Chancellor of Chautauqua.”  There is a whole history of American interest in the Holy Land in the 1800s of which I have been ignorant. 

If you have visited Palestine Park and have any observations or suggestions for potential visitors, feel free to comment below.

Share:

From ICEJ News:

Israel’s Tourism Ministry announced on Monday that 1.9 million tourists visited the country between January and July, keeping 2010 on track to be a record year for incoming tourism and breaking the magic number of 3 million. The numbers are already a 34% improvement over last year, and also include data indicating tourists are highly satisfied with the quality of local tour guides, the historic sites they were taken to see, and services offered in restaurants, bus lines, gift shops and hotels. “The consistent growth in incoming tourism over recent months, alongside the increasing satisfaction tourists feel toward the service they receive in Israel, should not be taken for granted,” said Tourism Minister Stas Meseznikov. “This is the result of large investments in marketing, public relations, infrastructure development, encouraging investors and upgrading the training and service frameworks.

Share:

Who should pay for the water drunk by visitors to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem? 

The church should, according to a new decision by the city’s water company.

From the Jerusalem Post:

“We are providing water to the pilgrims and tourist for free,” says doorkeeper Jawal Hussein. “It’s not fair. We should not have to pay.”
Slumped on a small stone bench at the entrance to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Hussein reflected on reports that the Jerusalem water company had decided to end a centuries-old tradition and is now demanding the church pay for its water.
Gihon, the public water company in Jerusalem, has also reportedly demanded the church pay its back bill dating to 1967, when Israel assumed control of east Jerusalem and the walled Old City from the Jordanians. According to AsiaNews.it, a Christian news site, the decision would break a tradition honored by both the British and Jordanian rulers who had controlled the site in the past century.

There is, however, a significant problem: who do they send the bill to?  There is no single authority over the property, and the various church groups are hardly able to work things out between them. 

There is also the question of fairness.

A Franciscan monk aiding a group of pilgrims from South Korea through the church paused to contemplate the water bill.

“I have heard about it but I don’t understand why the government wants to discriminate against us,” said the monk, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. “Are the synagogues and the mosques paying?” “We are doing a favor to the pilgrims and tourists,” he added. “The government must be earning something from [their visit]. We are doing them a favor.”
“But if the synagogues and mosque have to pay, then I guess we have to pay as well,” the monk added.
The Gihon water company issued a statement saying that they have not, “as of this moment,” cut off the water supplies of any religious institution.
It added that it was charging a standard price of about $4 dollars per cubic meter for water from all religious institutions in the Old City, including mosques, synagogues and churches.
“It should be stressed that this is a uniform fee for all,” the statement said.

Is this true?  Does the rabbinate pay for the water that comes from the fountains at the Western Wall? 

It seems to me that the rules should be the same for the two places, as both are religious landmarks freely open to the public.  

Holy fire ceremony from dome, mat14517

Holy Sepulcher rotunda with visitors for Ceremony of Holy Fire (source)
Share:

In recent years Israel has been developing a southern baptism site on the Jordan River in the Jericho area.  The country of Jordan opened a counterpart on the eastern side nearly a decade ago.  But the poor quality of the water threatens to close the site before it officially opens.  From the Jerusalem Post:

The site where tradition holds Jesus was baptized is in danger of being declared off-limits to pilgrims because of pollution in the Jordan River.  Qasar al-Yahud, a few miles from where the biblical river spills into the Dead Sea, has drawn over 100,000 tourists each year, most of whom are Christian pilgrims who wish to undergo a baptism like their savior did 2,000 years ago — and in the very same spot. But drought and irrigation have turned the mighty lower Jordan River into a stagnant stream as it makes it way from the Sea of Galilee. The brook then swells with raw sewage as it passes nearby Jericho. Israeli health officials are reportedly considering erecting signs warning: “Polluted Waters. Entry Forbidden.” […] Neglected for decades, the name of the site is Arabic for “Castle of the Jews,” which is also the name of the 5th century monastery. But since 2007, Israel has tried to bring Christian tourists ‘down by the riverside’ and has invested about $2 million to develop the site in order to allow wheelchair accessibility, shade, baptismal decks and other facilities. Entry is free. There is a similar site close-by on the Jordanian side, but the west bank side is considered holier since that’s the side Jesus likely used. […] Despite the heath risks, the Nature and Parks Authority continues to move ahead with restoration efforts including plans to open the site to tourists without the need for coordination with the military.

The JPost article is accompanied by a photo, the caption of which reads, “Pilgrims dunk themselves in stagnant sewage.”  The photo, however, was taken at the northern site of Yardenit, where the water quality is good. 

Share:

Caspari Media Review reports on this article from Haaretz:

Under the title "There’s a way but no gospel," Tali Cheruti-Sober reported on the difficulties experienced by Maoz Yinon in opening up the "Jesus Trail." Despite enlisting the support of the Government Tourist Office, erecting basic sign posts, publishing a map, and creating a web site, they have been virtually left to run the trail by themselves – with the help of international volunteers. "’We’re talking about a national site in the possession of the State which has no public sponsor to develop and market it,’ says Yinon, ‘and that’s a great pity.’" Typically, however, this is not the end of the story. Rather than investing in the already-existing trail, the Jewish National Fund has plans to implement a rival "Gospel Trail" – "a plan initiated in 2000, buried in the Intifada, and abruptly resurrected. The trail – like its name – is almost identical to the Jesus Trail. … It will be signposted by black basalt stone markers very expensive to prepare. New trails will be blazed – and the cost: three million shekels, with an option of development. The fact that two virtually identical trails will be marketed separately to the same tourist market does not put off the project’s organizer, Amir Moran: ‘We are dealing with principles according to which heritage paths are being built and for which comprehensive and organized work is necessary. … We have no opposition to a private project, but that isn’t the way of the State.’"

There must be a lot of better ways to spend that money.  We’ve noted the original “Jesus Trail” before here and here and here.

Share: